Skip to main content
Главная страница » Tennis » Ghirardato, Emma Ottavia vs Hageman, Madelief

Ghirardato, Emma Ottavia vs Hageman, Madelief

Expert Overview

The upcoming match between Emma Ottavia Ghirardato and Madelief Hageman on August 7, 2025, at 08:30 presents a compelling betting landscape. Ghirardato, known for her aggressive baseline play and powerful serves, faces Hageman, who excels in consistency and tactical acumen. The odds suggest a competitive match with several betting angles to consider.

Ghirardato, Emma Ottavia

LWLWL
-

Hageman, Madelief

WWLWW
Date: 2025-08-07
Time: 08:30
(FT)
Venue: Not Available Yet
Score: 0-2

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)93.20%(0-2)
Under 1st Set Games59.20%(0-2)
Over 1st Set Games73.30%(0-2)
Tie Break in Match (No)85.10%(0-2)
Under 2.5 Sets78.20%(0-2)
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)62.20%(0-2)
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)54.90%(0-2)

Betting Predictions

Tie Break in 1st Set

The odds for no tie break in the first set stand at 92.50, indicating a strong likelihood that the set will be decided without a tiebreak. This suggests one player may dominate early on, potentially due to serving advantage or superior baseline play.

First Set Games

The prediction for under 1st set games is 57.30, while over is at 72.40. This leans towards an expectation of a longer first set, possibly due to both players’ defensive capabilities and the likelihood of tight exchanges.

Tie Break in Match

With odds at 83.80 for no tie break in the match, it’s anticipated that one player might secure a decisive second set victory, avoiding the need for a third-set tiebreak.

Total Sets

The prediction for under 2.5 sets is 76.80, suggesting a high probability of a straight-sets victory or a quick three-setter, reflecting both players’ potential to capitalize on their strengths early.

Total Games

For total games, the 3-way under 22 games stands at 64.30, while the 2-way under 22.5 games is at 54.50. These predictions point towards a brisk match with fewer games overall, possibly due to one player’s ability to control rallies and finish points efficiently.